Communication Technology & AI

Custom AI Agents

Custom AI Agents

AI agents designed around defined tasks

An AI agent is useful when it has a recognisable task, relevant information and clear operational boundaries. Assigning it a broad objective is not enough to expect it to handle every situation.

We design custom agents to support communication, research, monitoring, content and knowledge management activities. We start with people’s work and define which steps the system may perform, which tools it may use and when it needs to request a review.

The aim is to build useful, assessable support, not an indiscriminate replacement for the organisation’s expertise and responsibilities.

Consistent knowledge, instructions and tools

The quality of the work depends on how materials, instructions and permitted actions are organised. We define information sources, updating criteria and how the agent should distinguish available information from missing data.

The project may include searching authorised materials, preparing drafts, classification or clearly bounded sequences of activities. Each connection to tools and systems is assessed against access arrangements, compatibility and practical usefulness.

We do not assume that the agent can integrate every platform or independently verify every claim. When information is insufficient, the process needs to provide for clarification or referral to a responsible contact.

Design boundaries before actions

We agree permitted data, permissions and authorised operations with those responsible. We distinguish producing a proposal from authorising its execution: publication, sending or significant changes may require explicit approval before action.

We define human checks, error handling and ways to stop the process. Outputs are tested on representative cases, including ambiguous information, out-of-scope requests and inadequate responses.

Choosing a technology does not automatically resolve privacy, security or contractual matters. These are examined with the appropriate functions in the context of the project, without promising universal autonomy or the absence of errors.

When to develop a custom agent

The project is useful when an activity is sufficiently defined to be described, tested and evaluated. Before development, we check whether the problem actually requires an agent or a simpler solution. Cases may include the following.

  • Support searches and consultation of authorised company materials.
  • Prepare drafts and summaries for review by the relevant contacts.
  • Organise information and content using shared, verifiable criteria.
  • Assist repetitive workflows with recognisable steps and approvals.
  • Make distributed knowledge easier to access while keeping sources and response limitations visible.

How we build the agent

  1. 01

    Define the task

    We gather objectives, user needs and the current process. We establish inputs, expected outputs, boundaries and evaluation criteria, identifying the decisions that must remain with the people involved.

  2. 02

    Prepare the system

    We organise knowledge, instructions and permitted tools. We define access and approvals, building a bounded prototype that can be tested without prematurely extending its operational scope.

  3. 03

    Test and refine

    We assess usefulness, accuracy and behaviour against the agreed cases. We document errors and out-of-scope requests, updating materials and instructions where tests reveal problems.

  4. 04

    Adopt and oversee

    We support users during adoption and define updating responsibilities. We agree periodic checks and conditions for changing or suspending use when the context or results require it.

Support integrated into the team’s responsibilities

The work may include task analysis, material organisation, instruction design, a prototype, selected integrations, tests and operational guidance. Deliverables and maintenance are defined within the agreed scope.

We clarify what the agent can do, what requires review and what it must not do. Its value lies in a manageable process where people can understand outputs and decide how to use them, rather than a promise to eliminate all human involvement.

User guidance also explains how to recognise an incomplete response and whom to contact. The team needs to be able to challenge a result and correct the process rather than rely solely on the fluency of generated language.

Related services

CONTACT

Let's talk about your project

Tell us about your goals, context and priorities. We will get in touch to explore how we can help.

Saved articles

Your saved list stays in this browser, without an account or syncing across devices. Clearing site data removes it. Articles are not available offline.